Comment: You still have it wrong

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Hardly... (see in situ)

You still have it wrong

"The truth is they've looked at the 'facts' and they've rendered a judgement on the vicious, small, cruel God of the more radical literalist Christian interpretations of the bible: he's a bastard. "

Based on what objective morals can you render God a "bastard". Do you have his knowledge of why he did what he did? Do you know his exact thought? Better yet how can you even define any behavior as bad or good beyond merely yourself without an objective standard?