Comment: I don't agree with this part

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: rand paul deceiving ron paulians? (see in situ)

I don't agree with this part

"i think he is also showing how americans are being deliberately divided and conquered by both parties... if you read the history and writings of our founders and freedom fighters, that's how they did it."

No they didn't. You must be reading GRIC* history books. When our founders went for divide and conquer, if they were conquered they didn't submit. That's why there was a war.
Rand's battle wasn't against Brennan; he admitted from the start he'd vote for him if he got an answer to his question. He wasn't 'divided' on his vote for Brennan, he wanted an answer. Obaliar gave him one, but it now leaves me with more questions than answers.
Who will determine 'immanent threat'?
What if the 'immanent threat' is a false flag operation?
Why is 'collateral damage' acceptable?

*GRIC - Government Run Indoctrination Centers aka public schools

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison