















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I don't agree with this part
I don't agree with this part
"i think he is also showing how americans are being deliberately divided and conquered by both parties... if you read the history and writings of our founders and freedom fighters, that's how they did it."
No they didn't. You must be reading GRIC* history books. When our founders went for divide and conquer, if they were conquered they didn't submit. That's why there was a war.
Rand's battle wasn't against Brennan; he admitted from the start he'd vote for him if he got an answer to his question. He wasn't 'divided' on his vote for Brennan, he wanted an answer. Obaliar gave him one, but it now leaves me with more questions than answers.
Who will determine 'immanent threat'?
What if the 'immanent threat' is a false flag operation?
Why is 'collateral damage' acceptable?
*GRIC - Government Run Indoctrination Centers aka public schools
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison