The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Bottom line: Can the govt use drone strikes on American soil?
Bottom line: Can the govt use drone strikes on American soil?
Yes.
Holder's letter answered a specific question. In his letter he framed the question and answered it this way:
""Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" The answer to that question is no."
It does not rule out the use of a weaponized drone to kill an 'enemy combatant' (whatever that is) on American soil and in doing so will, in all probability, murder innocent Americans who will fall under the category of 'collateral damage' - and we all know what 'collateral damage' means.
So actually, Holder lied. Americans not engaged in combat will be killed by drone strikes on American soil. They just won't be the target.
I don't know why this point is being missed.
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison
Replies to this comment: