Comment: I don't have to re-read

You missed my point entirely.

Different people have different opinions and they represent those opinions as truth.

For you to represent your opinion as the ultimate, pure truth is no more valid than me or anyone else doing the same.

For instance with 9/11 truthers...you don't have evidence, you have conjecture. I'm more than willing to accept that 9/11 could have been committed by our government, but you don't have absolute proof. So, don't tell me that is "truth."

Answer this: Is it Constitutional to drone strike an American citizen on American soil instead of providing them a fair and speedy trial as defined by the 5th amendment?