You're sitting here arguing for Rand. I'm disagreeing with Rand saying the Constitutionality of his specific question to Obama that was answered by Holder is in question.
You dismiss my Constitutionality question and make it a moral issue, which I agree with, but you end up completely railing against your own argument and siding towards mine.
Using drone strikes on American citizens on American soil is both Unconstitutional and immoral. Rand argued for it under the circumstances that they are being combative. Ron would disagree. Judge Napolitano would disagree. I disagree.
The rest of your message is near indistinguishable.
What happens, my friend (enemy), when suddenly the law of gravity doesn't apply? What do you do then?
What the hell are you talking about?!
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representat