Your points -as I've stated- have already been answered. If you object to the answers given then you should object to the answers; in that particular post. However, you do not want to do that. Is it possible for me to answer your questions; yes, but I need not do so if the answeres have already been presented for all who would like to see them. You do not want to see them, therefore you are resorted to trying to make an argument over nothing.
The fact that you desire to create an immoral, entity to conduct immoral activities can sy nothing about you than you approve of immorality or you are unethical. The fact that you know that your unethical entity will devolve into a totalitarian tyrannical entity which subjugates, loots, enslaves, and murders those it was created to protect and yet you still desire it, speeks volumes of who you really are.
I saw a comment by one of your kind -government advocator- speeking about how Voluntaryists are like a drunk businessman passed out just asking to be taking advantage of. My comment to that person was, it indicates what kind of person -one who would have to think about not taking advantage of a passed out person- is and why they would advocate for a government. This individual would not have taken advantage of the drunk, not because he is a moral individual but because he would probably be afraid of getting caught; however, he would authorize an entity called Government to be able to do it.
This is why I asked the question about what it says about a person who advocates for an entity to be able to commit immoral, unethical, and 'evil' acts. To show you that basically you are that immoral, unethical, and 'evil' entity; you're just afraid of getting caught in the act so you create an entity call Government and give it fuctions, which no person would ever dream of doing to another person.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: