my arguments reflect a "do it my way or else" approach. But we're simply competing in the marketplace of ideas and anarchism cannot compete. So your attempt to characterize this competition as "do it my way or else", is ironic because it's anarchists who say markets have the ability to be the arbiter of all things good and evil.
One of the reasons I support the Constitution and Bill of Rights is they guarantee the anarchist's right to speak freely about their ideas, and allow the marketplace of ideas to determine which ideology is applied to society. If all media banned speech pertaining to anarchism, wouldn't anarchists demand that the State funded judicial system secure their right to free speech? If they did, I would support the use of my tax dollars to defend the anarchist's right to free speech. And my support for this judicial process is based on voluntarily consent.
http://www.dailypaul.com/277342 (Rand Paul: One person can make a difference)
http://www.StandUpForYourRights.me/?p=1264 (Fast and Furious hearing)