Comment: I know that he did that, but . . .

I give him leeway, as I give Dr. Paul leeway--

the fact is that I don't believe 'savage' is a bad word--

Dr. Paul's ideas ARE radical--

the fact is, I'll let you in on a little secret--LOL! . . .

Dr. Paul and Dr. Chomsky are both ornery old men who want to know and seek the truth--

and I believe that they might step on each other's toes--

a bit of a turf war, so to speak. Dr. Paul doesn't even mention Noam Chomsky--

two grumpy old men who have tried to take on the world, each in his own way--

and the world is better for both of them.

Dr. Chomsky faces the truth that implementing Dr. Paul's ideas would be very difficult for people to do--

it is true; *we* all know that; there are many of *us* who want that, even if it IS hard--

but *we* know it would be hard anyway--

Dr. Paul has joined forces with other ornery old men who are 'progressives'--

he respects men with principles; Dr. Chomsky has principles.

If I were to choose which man I would rather spend an hour with, however, make no mistake about it, it would be Dr. Paul.

But Chomsky has a good mind and a good heart, and there are far too few of those around--

:(