But you see the way all neo cons get around that is by not acknowledging Libertaraian "Non-Interventionism" as a bona fide foreign policy position. Libertarians saw a need for a new defination and coined the term. Conveniently, Neo cons will only acknowledge the two extremes of isolationism (saying it has always included both positions economic and military, which , technically is true) and interventionist. Libertarians, seeing our insane foreign policy, felt a new third option was required, and they fought back against the "or" in the defination commonly used for isolationism. The "or" that included both economic or military isolationism in one term. I see the need the Libertarians saw, so, I agree and you agree, just about all of us here do...but neo cons do not and will not even debate it, they just kick it aside. I know I have tried.
Stuck they are, muuuum...
If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: