The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a


Comment: Yes, government and its
Yes, government and its
Yes, government and its activity politics are control. But shouldn't we be cautious in shrinking government and politics if doing so is transferring influence and control of (the individual's) life to who controls our government and dictates politics and policies? Why not retain the ability of government that serves justice before transference?
To transfer influence and control of life to the private sphere before justice is served can, but probably would, transform our standing to the controllers, that we're indentured to them, to slavery. The controllers work both spheres, public/government and private, but if most their presence resides in one, let's be in the other sphere then serve them justice to prevent their presence from growing where we are, whereby they'd occupy both spheres greatly or completely.
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me