The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: What would be honorable would
What would be honorable would
What would be honorable would a "good" cop gathering actual evidence and using the law against the bad cops instead of running to their superior and tattling. What would be the ultimate in honor would be confronting them. You're mixing up covering up for someone and lying. If a "good" cop were to be asked about a bad cops actions and refused to answer or outright lied, that would be dishonorable. If they simply didn't run to snitch, there's nothing wrong with that. Snitching is no better than gossip and rumors. It's just hearsay that could potentially wind up indicting the innocent.
Replies to this comment: