Comment: Unless they could provide evidence

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Not arguing they are not doing it (see in situ)

Unless they could provide evidence

which will get a conviction they won't get a reward.

I argue that the one coming to get paid, is by my definition already devoid of morality, and as such is suspect in any witness they may bare against another.

There is no disagreement here. Shaeffer Cox was convicted based on testimony and a recording from an FBI informant that was facing FELONY CHARGES for FRAUD.

Yet they still convicted Shaeffer... for a first amendment protected activity. You're going to tell me anyone with a badge is a less credible witness than that guy?