Comment: All of that is irrelevant.

(See in situ)

All of that is irrelevant.

You yourself stated in a previous reply that to prove something scientifically, it must be repeatably testable yielding the same results each time. That method is called "the scientific method" by the way.

Then here you state (paraphrasing) "well, since we can't test it, it doesn't mean it isn't proven science", completely contradicting yourself.

A theory either has or has not been scientifically proven via scientific method. Since, as you admit, specie-to-specie evolution has not been nor can it ever be tested, then your belief in it as fact is religionist, no different from any creationist.

This is precisely why Charles Darwin himself stated that the theory evolution is not scientific.