The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: I must be

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: ? (see in situ)

I must be

since I see NO irrefutable proof of a plane other than some debris that could have EASILY been planted there prior to flying a drone into the building.

I'm only gonna ask this one more time, where are the wing impact points!? Did they also melt like the ENTIRE plane that crashed in a field?

You must have an entertaining theory of how Building 7 just fell, don't you?

I'm not here to fight with you, even though some may prefer it, but rather trying to point out that there are some very unconvincing pieces of selective photographic evidence to sell the official story. Even members of the 911 Commission have come forward that the investigation was full of holes (No pun intended).

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin