Comment: You are citing proven disinformationalists

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: (see in situ)

You are citing proven disinformationalists

You first cite a paper by Frank Legge and David Chandler, and then provide two links to Legge's website. Chandler's previous paper on this subject was thoroughly debunked by CIT. They also challenged him and his co-author to a public debate, which he refused to accept. Frank Legge's previous paper was also through debunked by CIT.

Around the time that the paper that you cite was published, CIT again challenged Chandler, Kevin Ryan (Legge's co-editor), and their associates to an in person debate, on camera while they were all scheduled to be in Toronto for the 10th anniversary of 9/11. In the invitation it explained:

We will be arriving in the early evening on Thursday, September 8th, the first day of the Toronto Hearings. We will not be departing until the early morning on Tuesday, September 13th. There is no reason that the people who apparently have such strong concerns with our work and who have attempted to publicly paint us as dishonest shouldn't be able to set aside a couple hours to take us up on this offer, "expose" our supposed dishonesty, and refute the evidence we present proving the plane did not hit the light poles or Pentagon. We will work with them to find a mutually convenient day and time.

None of them accepted.