Comment: So one witness who "thinks"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Wrong (see in situ)

So one witness who "thinks"

So one witness who "thinks" he saw a "second" plane is enough evidence to you, to outweigh the over 100 witnesses that saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Twenty six of which specifically stated an American Airlines plane.

Slight discrepancies on the exact flight path by eyewitnesses is to be expected. I provided scientific refutation to that theory. It doesn't even compare in weight of evidence to all that which supports that AA flt 77 hit the Pentagon anyway.

So what are you arguing then did hit the Pentagon then, and what evidence do you have that supports that belief?