Comment: How are they "proven

(See in situ)

How are they "proven

How are they "proven disinformationalists"?

My point is that there are "experts" on both sides of the "flight path" debate. Either way it makes no difference to me as building an entire case off of discrepancies in eyewitness testimony and disregarding all other evidence doesn't begin to prove anything to me. I mean if that's the best evidence against the AA flt hitting the Pentagon then like I said there's no comparison in the evidence. Over 100 witnesses, plane parts, and body parts identified by dna all dwarf theories supported only by eyewitness testimony discrepancy to me.