Comment: Ok. I accept your point of view based on what contributes to it

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: 1. Of course I'd like to see (see in situ)

Ok. I accept your point of view based on what contributes to it

But you and I can both look at any photo you wish and see no evidence of wing or engine impact.

Forget what witnesses say. Forget what may or may not be debris.

In ANY photo, do YOU YOURSELF see wing or engine impact points?

I cannot see such evidence. Anywhere. And that evidence should be the PRIMARY evidence by which all other evidence should be supported. But if the PRIMARY Evidence is not present, you MUST come to the point to question the evidence that follows.

? + 1 ≠ 2

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin