Actually, this is an improvement. They use to send in people to mark posts down for various posters and all sorts of topics on Daily Paul, but that became too obvious to many people, so they try to maintain equilibrium - at zero - marginalization. The goal is to *not* (directly) attack the messenger, now.
On Daily Paul, what you need to watch for is posts with high volume of readers ups and downs, which somehow comes out exactly equal. Not likely of course, but from one point of view, better than making it too obvious.
Of course, any thread that is well researched on any topic that contains information that is usually censored - will get upvoted by information junkies. So if the only reason for a downvote is censorship - and it's a liberty loving site, something is wrong.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: