The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
Ge


Comment: There was no hate because the
There was no hate because the
There was no hate because the bills are completely different. Why do Rand defenders feel the need to tear down Ron?
The wording of Ron's act was centered on empowering the states to act on abortion and depriving the FEDERAL courts of trumping these powers. Rand's bill, by contrast, would federally ban abortion by trumping the rights of the states via the 14th amendment. If Rand wants the states to decide, he is sure being mighty silent about it which has almost nothing in common with Rand's nationalist alternative.
See here for the plain words of Ron's 2005 bill:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.776.IH::