Comment: In order to have a coherent

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: If you stick (see in situ)

In order to have a coherent

In order to have a coherent conversation using reason, I will attempt to transpose your reply unto the questions. Please correct any errors:

1. Who or what type of entity can possess a bundle of rights to exclude? A) Wise overlords, B) Any party who consents, and C) The biggest dick.

2. What things can be excluded from use? A) Anything decreed by wise overlords, B) Anything consenting parties agree to exclude from a third party victim, and C) Anything the biggest dick gets a hard-on for.

3. How is exclusion possession justly acquired? A) Declaration by wise overlords, B) Valid contracts which exclude a third party victim, and C) Anything the biggest dick pisses on.

4. What constitutes evidence of exclusion possession? A) A fancy title, B) A signed agreement, and C) The biggest balls.