I didn't "slam" you for defending PETA, I pointed out that your argument was constructed with emotion and flimsy logic, and pointed out that there is plenty of evidence that shows PETA in a bad light, but very little in the way of good.
Also, you make a baseless assumption by claiming that I don't know anything about PETA "except for what the MSM told me". See? There it is. You acting like an elitist know-it-all while putting forth ZERO evidence, just like last time.
No, the reason why I "slammed" you was for the same reason why I'm doing it now; because you're being a kneejerk reactionary who's quick to make assumptions.
EDIT: Actually, you know what? This really isn't the time/thread for this debate.
A signature used to be here!