The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: I reckon it depends on the

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: No Offense But (see in situ)

I reckon it depends on the

I reckon it depends on the definition of anarchist. If anarchist means there are no rulers with any inherent authority or dominion over other men then there is no contradiction. If anarchist means one can never have a ruler, even a self appointed one then there would appear to be a contradiction.