Comment: My bad not a slip of the tongue:

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What's more grotesque? (see in situ)

My bad not a slip of the tongue:

He's giving his opinion of what he believes will be the future after the post Marxist experience.

"Marxism not irrelevant and anarchism more relevant".

In other words: collectivism not irrelevant individual vuluntariyism more relevant.

Meaning that marrxism will continue to be a philosophy that will influence society. And anarchism will become more prominent in society. He's just stating his opinion regarding what he sees as being the future social political outlook after the post Marxists experience.

Before he says all of this he very clearly explains that he subscribes to the anarchist tradition.

Dude listen again. Youre jumping to unfounded conclusions. I defended him upon your initial marxist claim, without llistening to what he said, because He and I share many personal acquaintances and friends. Upon reading all of your following posts I listened again carefully and my final respond is what I have just stated; he is giving his opinion on the post Marxist experience.

"We’ve moved beyond the Mises textbook. We’re running in the open market." - Erik Voorhees