Comment: Nice Dodge...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I dont know, but its (see in situ)

Nice Dodge...

...but nothing smells like marijuana but marijuana.....Not cologne, not body stench. Neither have I posed a marijuana related scenario.

I related a 'smell' connected to a legitimate 'bad-act', e.g., residential arson.

That aside, if you think some perfume can be confused for reeking of a petroleum distillate (gasoline), then you are not being honest with yourself or you have led a truly sheltered life.

So, back to my scenario, is this simple construct sufficient in your world to authorize an investigative detention?

I know what 'the courts' have said and don't care. I want to know where someone who says that a smell is 'never' a reason, draws the line, if at all.

When one makes a definitive statement, such as you did, it deserves to be tested.