you HONESTLY think the main objection to Rand is the Romney endorsement? How can you honestly try to portray it like that when you are a frequent reader of Daily Paul?
You are conveniently leaving out objections over Rand's foreign policy, his being praised by zionists and neocons, his wanting to "fix" the current fiat dollar system by paying down the interest on the debt (which is fraudulent and mathematically untenable -- i.e. Rand doesn't believe in his father's sound money), etc etc..
Basically your tactic is to baselessly portray people who question Rand as one-dimensional irrational emotionally-driven morons. Perhaps that is an indirect ad hominem but it is an ad hominem none-the-less...
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~