there are quite a few Christian-anarchists around (even some on the DP). In fact, Christian-anarchists have been around for quite a while. And even many of those who don't identify as "Christian" still value morality. I've seen many anarchist/voluntaryist individuals on the DP making the case for their position based on government, by its very nature, going against the the principle of non-aggression. Is that not a *moral* argument? Does that not demonstrate that they do have some set of *morals*? You want to know what I haven't seen? Personally, I have not come across a single anarchist/voluntaryist on the DP, or anywhere for that matter, who held a libertine philosophy and/or was an anarchist/voluntaryist because they wanted to go out raping, pillaging, or whatever else it is you've convinced yourself these folks want to do. EVERY person I have come across who holds anarchist views has reached that position based on a set of *moral* principles.
It's quite laughable that you would encourage others to "have compassion on the trolls" (which you consider to be the an-caps) considering the personal insults and vitriol you've spewed at them. Maybe you ought to pray to remove that plank in your eye before you concern yourself with removing the speck from your brother's.
I'm reaching up and reaching out.
I'm reaching for the random or what ever will bewilder me.
And following our will and wind we may just go where no one's been.
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: