[note: I'm also a regular reader and fan of RW's blog]
I agree that Wenzel was a mess. He should've straightened out his beef prior to the debate. Why did we need to hear RW complain in public? Is getting side-tracked by stuff like that important to the liberty movement?
I got almost nothing out of what I listened to and couldn't bear to listen longer (maybe I'll revisit). RW was very emotional ("Stephan! Stephan!") and I agree that it's a concern that his judgment can get clouded by these types of issues.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: