The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Im not sure that the "truther movement" is attempting

(See in situ)

Im not sure that the "truther movement" is attempting

to lay blame on anyone, but I may be wrong as I am unaffiliated with them. I assumed by what videos I have seen, protests, and other that the truther movement wants an independent investigation into 9/11. While I have met and seen the fringe that sell the no plane opinion, the Cheney/Neo con/Israel Mossad line, as well as the nuclear super weapon theory, but as a group I think their desire is for a new, thorough, and independent investigation.

I'm not sure how anyone could not get behind that, if for nothing else the families whose questions were never addressed by the very people tasked with doing so. No matter which side you are on, a new investigation would seem to put to rest the mass conspiracy theory in general. This can be accomplished easier than getting Obama to provide his birth certificate simply by releasing the pentagon crash videos to the public, all of them. Forcing Bush and Cheney to testify separately and under oath, and allowing credible people like John Farmer to question these people about the inconsistencies he found. Also members from architects and engineers to question representatives from NIST, and so on. Even the anti conspiracy folks should rally to have this done so their theories can be proven in the open, or debunked in the same.

I do agree with you on the point that those that claim this person or that is responsible to support their theory might be pushing things over the edge, but if these items are not brought to light and open for discussion then we just as well accept that the one event that ushered in the destruction of the U.S., the police state apparatus, TSA, DHS, and the hodgepodge of government alphabet soup that currently resides over us as the norm, I for one choose to openly discuss these things if for nothing more than the future of my own children living in a nation of free people.

While I might not agree with folks that claim to know the truth, have the names and reasons behind their complicity, and cannot be swayed from their position, I certainly want to hear it, and if someone is offended then they should not participate in the discussion in the first place. The dailypaul has been the bastion of reason and the unreasonable, but there are few places left where open discussion is not quelled by the statists controlling the conversation. I would certainly not visit the DP should one day discussions be banned or moderated because of a person or persons being offended by the content, as each individual has the free will to participate or to ignore that which they dare not touch.

Always remember:
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." ~ Samuel Adams
If they hate us for our freedom, they must LOVE us now....

Stay IRATE, remain TIRELESS, an