Comment: Replacing analogies

(See in situ)

Replacing analogies

does not address your judgment about the process of seeking the truth which point you glossed over. The point I was making is that without adequate information, no one has the right to judge anyone else for their efforts to seek the truth. Your main post does just that and I feel it diminishes efforts to seek the truth. The exercise of back tracking from “OJ did it” to “who did it” illustrates that the fallacy and appeal to ignorance you speak of can only be overcome when people do not overstate the facts or make faulty assumptions (as I was led to believe you did from your OJ did it comment). I do, however, respect your desire to rectify a shaky premise.