Comment: New angle, same conspiracy.

(See in situ)


New angle, same conspiracy.

I looked at the videos of eyewitnesses here and they are no different than any other eyewitness from the truther movies. Bottom line both sides should be demanding a new investigation, independently ran, and by people the American people trust so one side could look at the other and say "I told you so". The anti truthers are as passionate about their conspiracy as the truthers, yet both are conspiracy theorists as no one can know until the video's are released unmolested, and examined by multiple entities, and a proper and true investigation takes place.

I look at the proof positive photos provided and do not see anything but a garbage can sized piece of painted metal. In the truther video I did not see a definitive video showing the plane from multiple angles and the impact. Nothing on either side would prove anything to me were it the first I had looked at any of the evidence. How about the two sides stop bickering long enough to demand a real investigation? Perhaps the confusion in the matter is so that you argue instead of get to and demand the facts be released.

I am no truther or non truther and enjoy both sides of the story, yet neither side holds one ounce of proof positive.
*Jim Farmer states that testimony from U.S. officials were lies, about time lines and what really occurred, which at the very least shows they were/are hiding something. This is all available to the public from the documented times, to the video testimony going against these timelines, this is indeed fact.
*The FBI knew a Saudi cleric purchased 12 tickets and did nothing, nor have they acted against him/them, and more importantly bits of truth slip out at times and damage control is easy to spot which is now also fact:
http://video.ca.msn.com/watch/video/ex-senators-say-saudi-go...

So I have a challenge to both sides to convince someone who is neutral, but requires proof and not rhetoric. The evidence is out there, it is being suppressed, but until someone brings this forward I cannot believe either side. One thing is sure, if the U.S. government did not complete the investigation into Saudi involvement, then there was no investigation at all, period. The talking heads state that "We just don't want to know", but if one were honest with ones self it is obvious that we do not want to know because the Saudi government is our puppet, and our governments masters did not want an investigation for fear of something other than oil, since we protect Saudi Arabia militarily and could take it over at a whim, so what else could they be hiding? I would guess the U.S. players involved whether the CIA, a rouge official or military leader, or perhaps a supposed ally, I can only speculate, but I implore everyone to never stop asking the questions until we know the full truth.

Always remember:
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." ~ Samuel Adams
If they hate us for our freedom, they must LOVE us now....

Stay IRATE, remain TIRELESS, an