Comment: I don't think you are understanding this correctly.

(See in situ)

In post: .

I don't think you are understanding this correctly.

Even if the bottom 70% of the building was made out of playing cards, that resistance alone would have prevented the rest from falling at "free fall" speeds. You guys use that term not knowing that in using the term, you are proving that you don't really understand what happened. Freefall means that absolutely nothing was underneath the falling structure. Oviously there was something. Even if the supports were cut, or blown or something, there was still part of the building underneath the falling part which would have slowed the fall by a little bit. So even if you all are correct, and it was demolished with explosives and such, it still wouldn't have fallen at "free fall" speeds.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).