Comment: if the SCOTUS is arrogant enough to rule, "yes?"

(See in situ)

if the SCOTUS is arrogant enough to rule, "yes?"

then, all the 'talk' of Crossing the Rubicon would be done; it will literally signal the official illegitimacy of the ENTIRE statist infrastructure ruling over us 'peons,' even to some 'Blue Pill'-drones.

the case is one of perpetual 4th Amendment violation, I'd argue the 13th Amendment 'slavery repeal'-violation as well, not to mention clearly violates "NO Ex Post Facto" clause, without an ounce of doubt, PERIOD. And, Bill of Attainder; if they in fact choose to identify a group as 'sex offenders.' Obviously, real convicted rapists (NOT cases where a 16yo girl and her 18yo HS BF, consensual teen couple, who was ridiculously charged as a statutory rapist) deserve no less than castration, in a truly 'fair' universe, but like all crimes, if someone's served their time, I'd say 100% full restoration of ALL rights should be reserved to them. Why release them, if you're gonna make them 2nd class citizens??

This is why 'our' entire judicial system is a con, and utter joke, not to mention doesn't work, doesn't rehabilitate, nor actually punish those who really deserve it, plus there has never been a time in which govt have NOT put an innocent man in jail, or worse, murder them.

This case could, in theory, make all govt 'watch list' null and void; though you'd think in a supposed Constitutional Republic, they'd already be UnConstitutional, but then again, we don't live in such just, unicorn universe.

Starts 9 days from now: let us see if the regime will openly declare their masters, us the American Citizenry, their slaves, or not.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul