Comment: I'd try 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I would be suing the (see in situ)

I'd try 42 U.S.C. § 1983

I'd try 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil action for deprivation of rights).

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

It would be fun to try to get a federal prosecutor to go after them on Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law) and 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights). But fat chance for that under the current administration.

= = = =
"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job."

That means: For each job "created or saved" about five were destroyed.