Comment: Response VI to Eric Hoffer

(See in situ)


sharkhearted's picture

Response VI to Eric Hoffer

I asked Mr. Hoffer about at what cost does it come to the deaths of 3000 Americans and 6000 troops since them.

He responded:

"Apparently your cost is that you want to remain forcibly ignorant of physics and materials science.
Look, it's terrible that it happened, hell, I'll even say the government may have paid them to do it, or tricked them, or whatever, but the bottom line is that the planes took out the towers and WTC7 was pure gravy for them."

------------------------

So let me get this straight. On the one hand you say that because I am "forcibly ignorant of physics and materials science "(LOL)....on the other hand you admit the government may "have paid them to do it".

But then you level a "bottom line": You said: " The planes took out the towers and WTC7 was pure gravy for them."

So...if I as an informed layman as well as of hundreds of the thousands of others... and thousands of other architects and engineers are "forcibly ignorant of physics and materials science"....how much more "forcibly ignorant" is a statement like this one?:

"The planes took out the towers and WTC7 was pure gravy for them." HUH???

Does anybody see a problem with the circular reasoning of the above clause??

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.