Comment: I agree with you... but....

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Although I understand your (see in situ)

I agree with you... but....

But as we all know too well today, it's a legalistic point of view that seems to always rule the day. Clearly, I agree, this definitely infringes on our right to keep and bear arms and I don't believe the government has the "legitimate" authority to do it. Since the government is no longer reasonable, the government has taken the original meanings of things and has twiste the F' out of 'em to make them fit their desired goal then gets courts to agree with them. Which is a bunch of bull!

A court will side with the Government who will claim they are "regulating commerce".... which is NOT the original intent of the commerce clause by the way, even though the 2nd Amendment says "shall not infringe". They are going to argue that it doesn't "infringe" because "we can keep" our guns. I know how these pieces of sh't work. And that's probably how they would argue the "constitutionality" of this law if it came to pass.

Just sayin'. Thats why there comes a time when good men must disobey "unconstitutional" government commands. It is OUR duty to do so.

Love Liberty, be Vigilant

"Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Corinthians 3:17)

Faith in God will prevail all things!