Comment: The "responses" to this are sad.

(See in situ)

The "responses" to this are sad.

The article is pointing out the utter lack of substance behind the theories, and you immediately confirm the author's opinion by accusing them of being a paid stooge.

How about you actually address the four points made in the article instead of saying "we can't trust the government?"

I agree we can't trust them, BUT THEY HAVEN'T MADE ANY CLAIMS YET. Good Lord, what has the DP come to? There ISN'T an official narrative to examine!

I'm ALL FOR proposing explanations, but PLEASE back them up with something that's at least vaguely substantive.