Comment: Nope. You misconstrued my post.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What you're really saying: (see in situ)

Nope. You misconstrued my post.

I simply stated that the nature of these events makes it impossible for those of us who doubt the official narrative to provide "proof" that might be satisfactory to those who are more willing to reside in ambivalence or deference to authority.

And yes, being an observer of society, I notice that certain explosions and events are made a big deal while other, far more violent and destructive events, are ignored writ large. Therefore, I believe there is an agenda.

As other posters have noted, simply pointing out the flaws of the official stories should be enough to raise suspicion.

And sitting in ambivalence is SO insulting to the victims and future victims of these criminals, regardless of if they are authorities or otherwise. It is our job as free individuals to seek the truth and hold those people accountable.