If their conflict of interest conspiracy to commit this fraud isn't blasted far and wide, by both opponents and press; it's likely because of the latter's fear of financial loss or complicity in bribery to cover this up. At this point in the take over, I could even suspect physical threats.
What part of constitutional, lawful representation does Mike Rogers, (and his wife), want to use to justify his actions in pushing something they both directly benefit from; especially when it harms the rest of us all so much?!
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it. - Patrick Henry