If their conflict of interest conspiracy to commit this fraud isn't blasted far and wide, by both opponents and press; it's likely because of the latter's fear of financial loss or complicity in bribery to cover this up. At this point in the take over, I could even suspect physical threats.
What part of constitutional, lawful representation does Mike Rogers, (and his wife), want to use to justify his actions in pushing something they both directly benefit from; especially when it harms the rest of us all so much?!
Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may con