Comment: Adam Smith was for separation of labor.

(See in situ)


Adam Smith was for separation of labor.

All solid economists agree. For our entertainment, we may dub in simple math formulas like Keynes did. However, rational people can only rely on their own rational faculty to integrate facts. Blindly relying on authority of others is not the way to knowledge. For example, it is not enough to agree with my post because Adam Smith or von Mises had said so, you must be able understand in your own mind (after reading their arguments) why it is so.

Separation of labor would let experts argue between themselves.