Comment: Misconstrued because I said IF

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Misconstrued? (see in situ)

Misconstrued because I said IF

I said IF it is a false flag THEN WHEN the authorities control the forensic evidence and eye witness testimonies they will destroy forensic evidence, silence, release, or discredit real eye witnesses, and direct the investigation toward red herrings.

However, your post helped me clarify that the best way to tell if it is a false flag is to look at the transparency of the investigation and the evidence presented by the official story. If there swiss cheese style holes in the narrative it is likely a false flag.

And THEN since it is a false flag there can be little to no PROOF because the criminal themselves had complete control of the investigation and therefore all hard evidence.

BOTTOM LINE: If you demand hard evidence of a false flag YOU are setting yourself up in a logical contradiction that is impossible to disprove!