Comment: To quote: Not ironic that

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: There's nothing inherently (see in situ)

To quote: Not ironic that

To quote:

Not ironic that you'd commit the equivocation fallacy with the word unreasonable.

Now, please show where the equivocation fallacy was committed using the word unreasonable.

If this cannot be substantiated then it is my opinion the entire post containing the claim is devoid of meaning and will be seen simply a tangent and subsequently ignored.

Seeing as there was no intent on building a foundation for such a claim to begin with, I'm not holding my breath on this.