Comment: Why would they side with either side

(See in situ)


Why would they side with either side

without the evidence they need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The law dictates that one is innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This is the middle path to truth.

However taking the side of the official story propagated by the mainstream media without any evidence is downright dangerous. Why would someone just fall in line with the official story when the entire media has been proven to use lies, deception, trickery and conspiracy to be the cheerleaders for mass murder, torture, the Police state, bashing good people like Ron Paul, and on and on?

I am to the point that all experience with the mainstream media has proven that they are the prime driving factor in the destruction of our rights and peace. They have the right to speak freely but intentionally providing aid and comfort to the enemy of us is treason. Why would anyone side with traitors on anything especially with no real evidence?

One thing to look for with them intentionally deceiving is to ask yourself; are they propagating an outcome and conclusion universally with no real hard evidence. Are they nudging you in a direction? Do they attempt to reinforce this conclusion with "experts" who do not have access to the real evidence. This is a real sign that they are performing a coordinated attack against us in the info war.

The best thing to do is to kill your TV forever and drop the mainstream like a bad habit. Mainstream TV is worse for the human body and society at large than heroin.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...