Comment: Granger . . . killing for spying?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I dion't know about the false flags (see in situ)

Granger . . . killing for spying?

I think the last time Israeli spies were caught in the U.S. they were sent home to Israel unscathed?

I'll remember that; it's all right to kill people on a naval intelligence ship, because they are spying?

I try to be fair to Israel; I try to say that nobody should be getting aid, but you excuse Israel for killing men on a ship who were not physically threatening anyone?

And, by the way, the U.S. was involved in the 'birth' of Israel, but *she* (America) had no interest in what Israel was or was not doing?

This reminds me of the parents who are told that the children have no responsibility to the parents who gave them life and provision--

So, who gave 'birth' to Israel (besides the Zionists, who did not represent all Jews from the late 1800s until 1948 and beyond)--

the U.N. or England and the U.S.

Either way, if the evil U.N. gave birth to Israel what kind of child is Israel?

If the U.S. and England gave birth to Israel (or gave the Zionists what they wanted at the expense of the rest of world Jewry)--

then why can't the parents monitor television use and check up on FB now and again?

I am ashamed of the U.S. for MANY things, but the least shameful thing the U.S. did was to try to keep an eye on Israel during that bloody time--

and the men who were on that ship did not deserve to die. No accounting was ever made--

the truth was covered up--

and I don't see proof for the U.N. covering up what happened to the Liberty--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--