Comment: I don't because it jacks with a person's free will.

(See in situ)


I don't because it jacks with a person's free will.

If I ever find myself face to face with a Rothschild or Rockefeller, you may best your ass I will try. I really do not foresee that happening, I try to spend my days with the chickens and fish.
The "happy medium" I try to strike is being a little fairy of cognitive dissonance. A hypnotized person is not really free, and I believe if people were truly free, they would embrace love over fear. One of the BEST ways is to let the TV entranced blather on, and smile politely so they think you agree, and when they finally take a breath, smack them between the eyes with a question they cannot answer. If you have done any real research into the tangled web, there is always something.
I like "How is it justice if there is no trial, no evidence presented? Is it OK to execute people because the government and media decided they were guilty?"
Some will justify and rationalize, but just having there little nose rubbed in it when they thought they were "among friends" really has an affect. Ask like you really want to understand, not like an argument.
And sadly, unless we have a media as pervasive as theirs, we can't do what they do. I'm sort of hoping for Anonymous to come through with a "They Live" type scene - lol!

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.