Comment: No argument

(See in situ)

No argument

I think that there is a fundamental message contained in the speech, which I thought was the Topic, and I think the message is false.

Liberty is not secured by thoughtless inaction, or thoughtful inaction, rather, it seems to me, there has to be action designed to avoid those people who define the meaning of crime.

In those actions, it also seems to me, those of us who identify the criminals aught not abandon their next targeted victims, as if leaving that duty up to some nebulous, and probably deceptive, characterization of God.

So the speech, to me, sends the wrong message, or as sure as I am capable of misunderstanding the intended message, I misunderstand it.

What is the message in other words?

I hear: abandon the innocent victims.

Did I misunderstand the message?