Comment: More relevant, IMO: TO WHOM would terror crimes profit BEST?

(See in situ)


Cyril's picture

More relevant, IMO: TO WHOM would terror crimes profit BEST?

I don't believe in any rationale for the idea that anyone would wake up one morning and tell themselves, so to speak:

"Okay, so, today I'm going to get busy being a terrorist, killing innocent people, and terrorizing the hell out of the survivors."

Here's the truth I believe in:

"terrorist" activities simply come out of INTENDED or UNINTENDED consequences of government's PLUNDER. It really is that much binary, IMO.

Fanatics certainly exist and have always been. But nobody is ever born that way, or becomes that way out of spontaneous compulsion from a prior peaceful state of mind.

Why and how come "fanatic" or "terror" crimes?

I beg to ask, instead:

TO WHOM would those profit BEST to deny people their individual liberties FURTHER than already?

The beneficiaries can always be either foreign or domestic, but the same question applies.

They are the actual makers of "terrorism".

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius