Comment: Thanks for posting an opposing

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Prominent fraudster (see in situ)

Thanks for posting an opposing

view. The writer seems pretty flaky to me. The soldier's behavior with the officers, his legal actions, and his reasoning in the interview, all seem pretty solid. It's odd that the writer claims he's being stalked, but admits he's never met Grisham. The photo looks like he's goofing around, but it's posted like he's a lunatic. That seems pretty weak, and a little yellow, for a journalist. It's like a smear. Why is it convincing to you? I find myself in strong support of the soldier's case against the officers. I think we need educated and good police, making decent salaries. I agree that these cops should be fired, unless there are other circumstances that the video is not revealing. "They don't care about the law, and neither do we," is pretty damning.