you would need to provide a completely alternate explanation of what did happen that matches all the evidence. That you cannot do, because you are wrong.
There is what happened. There is the aftermath, and it is different from the beforemath, and the only explanation that matches the evidence is what happened. You can accept this, and maybe that the simulator in your head might have something wrong, or continue with this lunacy of niggling over every detail that doesn't match the idealistic, fairy-tale dream bomb attack you're envisioning.
"Not enough blood on him! HE NEEDS MORE BLOOD OR HE'S A FAKE!"
Listen to yourself!
"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: