That video - seriously?
1) Clearly that is his arm, as the Lorax demonstrates below.
2) As for the little square on the remains of the exploded backpack:
a) Why is it automatically assumed that the ripped up backpack is the one that contained the bomb? Doesn't that information come from the MSM? If so, according to you, it should automatically be distrusted. If we don't trust the MSM at all, we have no proof that that is even the backpack that held the bomb.
b) Commercially produced backpacks have little white squares on them too. Does that prove anything?
- - - - -
What is disappointing is that this thread has 14 up votes.
The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.
- Alan Watts
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: